Skip to Main Content

News and media releases: GIRO

Commission grants application for additional 20 pokies at the Foundry Hotel Complex

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

On 28 June 2014, the Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation heard an application from Drayton Manor Pty Ltd to increase the number of pokies at the Foundry Hotel Complex from 25 to 45.

Victorian Government introduces pokies tax changes

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

On 14 May 2014, the tax rate on electronic gaming machines (EGMs) at some hotels and clubs increased by 4.2 per cent.

Greyhounds Entertainment

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

Greyhound Promotions Pty Ltd applied for an amendment to its venue operator's license to increase the number of electronic gaming machines (EGMs) operating at Greyhounds Entertainment from 93 to 102.

Darebin City Council v Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

Grandview Hotel Victoria Pty Ltd was granted a license for 50 electronic gaming machines (EGMs) by the Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation.

Melbourne City Council v Kingfish Victoria

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

This is the first combined gaming and planning review proceeding where the tribunal has upheld the gaming approval but refused the planning approval.

Collingwood Football Club

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

Collingwood Football Club applied for an amendment to its license to add 8 electronic gaming machines (EGMs), increasing its EGMs from 80 to 88.

Mount Alexander Shire Council v Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

The Maryborough Highland Society lodged a license application for 65 pokies with the former Victorian Commission for Gambling Regulation (VCGR) in October 2011.

Francis Hotel Pty Ltd v Melbourne City Council

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

The Francis Hotel Pty Ltd applied for a license and planning permit for 32 electronic gaming machines (EGMs) for the Francis Hotel located on Lonsdale Street in Melbourne CBD.

The State of Victoria v Sportsbet Pty Ltd

Sportsbet, a bookmaker licensed in the Northern Territory, installed a device known as a betbox at the Eureka Stockade Hotel in East Ballarat, Victoria.

Melkat Pty Ltd v Campaspe Shire Council

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

As the operator of the Caledonian Hotel in Echuca, Melkat Pty Ltd wanted to install electronic gaming machines (EGMs) and was required to apply for a permit.

Maryborough Highland Society Inc.

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

Maryborough Highland Society applied for an amendment to their license to increase their electronic gaming machines (EGMs) from 56 to 59.

Royal Hotel Benalla

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

Royal Hotel Benalla applied for an amendment to their license to increase their electronic gaming machines (EGMs) from 20 to 30. If approved, the hotel said it would increase its financial contributions to the community.

Rennie v Darebin City Council

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

This case represents a successful challenge to a pokies installation made by a local resident, by objecting to the grant of a planning permit by the council. In its finding, the tribunal stated that an assessment of the social and economic impacts of pokies was required under planning legislation as well as during the licence application hearing by the commission.

Betfair v Western Australia

Betfair logo

The 2008 High Court decision of Betfair Pty Limited v Western Australia had major implications for how sports betting is conducted in Australia.

Macedon Ranges SC v Romsey Hotel

Rows of pokie machines with shallow depth of field.

The Romsey Hotel decision influenced how applications for gaming machines are heard at the Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation and the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Back to top